[ad_1]
Formerly incarcerated felons in Minnesota will now be able to vote after a new law restoring their rights was signed by the state’s governor.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz signed a bill on Friday which gives convicted felons who have completed their jail time the right to vote.
Now, 55,000 individuals who were previously deprived of those rights can register to vote, the most significant expansion of that right in Minnesota in a half-century, according to the governor’s office.
‘Minnesotans who have completed time for their offenses and are living, working, and raising families in their communities deserve the right to vote,’ Walz said.
The state is just one of at least 14, including Oregon, Tennessee and Texas, that have made proposals to affect similar changes, according to the Brennan Center for Justice.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz signed a bill on Friday which gives convicted felons who that have completed their jail time the right to vote
The change means 55,000 individuals who were previously deprived of voting rights can now register to vote in Minnesota. Pictured is the Minnesota State Capitol
An Oregon proposal would allow felons to vote while incarcerated. A Tennessee bill would automatically restore voting rights once a sentence is completed, except for a small group of crimes. Texas legislation would restore voting rights to those on probation or parole.
The bill signed by Walz on Friday means rights will be restored to convicted felons as soon as they get out of prison. Another bill currently moving through the New Mexico Legislature would do the same.
‘Restoring voting rights really is an issue where we’ve seen bipartisan momentum,’ said Patrick Berry, counsel for the Democracy program at the Brennan Center.
More than 4.6 million people are disenfranchised in the United States because of felony convictions, according to the Sentencing Project, which studies the issue and advocates for restoration of voting rights for former felons.
Laws vary by state, based on pardon requirements, payment of fines, fees and child support, and when a sentence (including probation and parole) is considered complete.
The impacts fall disproportionately on people of color, especially black citizens, who account for one-third of the total disenfranchised population while making up about 12 percent of the overall population.
TJ King, who couldn’t vote in Nebraska’s last election, is one person who would benefit from such changes. He is pictured during a hearing before the Government, Military and Veterans Affairs committee on February 22
King is an outreach specialist with the Nebraska AIDS Project. He came off probation in August after serving time for drug and theft convictions
TJ King, who couldn’t vote in Nebraska’s last election is one person who would benefit from such changes.
King, 51, fought addiction for years and spent five years in prison after being convicted of possessing ecstasy and theft by deception, ending probation last August.
King works in the HIV/AIDS field and volunteers at various organizations, but said voting is still the most direct way to be involved and became tearful when talking about his inability to vote.
‘I felt so hopeless and helpless not being able to have my voice heard in this last election,’ he said. ‘There are a lot of things that were on the ballot here in Nebraska that hit home with a lot of things that I advocate for.’
He is now an outreach specialist with the Nebraska AIDS Project and came off probation in August after serving time for drug and theft convictions.
In many states, he could have voted in the November general election, but Nebraska requires a two-year wait after the completion of a felony sentence before someone can register.
His first chance to vote will be in the 2024 presidential election season, unless a legislative proposal introduced in January passes and removes that two-year requirement.
Voting, King said in an interview, gives ‘a little bit of your strength back and a little bit of your voice back. Being able to vote, being able to have a say in what happens in your society, in your state, is extremely important.’
Restoring the voting rights of former felons drew national attention after Florida lawmakers weakened a voter-approved constitutional amendment and after a new election police unit championed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis arrested 20 former felons.
Several of them said they were confused by the arrests because they had been allowed to register to vote.
Attempts like those to discourage ex-felons from voting appear to be an outlier among the states, even as some Republican-led states continue to restrict voting access in other ways.
A Nebraska bill that would eliminate a two-year wait after the completion of a felony sentence before one can vote was authored by Sen. Justin Wayne (pictured)
Wayne has introduced bills multiple times to do away with the wait period and came close to success in 2017 when a bill passed the Legislature but was vetoed by then-Republican Gov. Pete Ricketts
In Nebraska, nearly 18,000 people are unable to vote because of felony convictions, said the Sentencing Project’s director of advocacy, Nicole Porter. That includes 7,072 who fall under the two-year wait requirement and are currently unable to cast a ballot. The rest have not completed their full sentences.
Steve Smith of Civic Nebraska, part of a large coalition of groups supporting the measure, said the wait creates a group of taxpayers who can’t choose their representatives.
‘You’re civically dead and you can’t vote for the people who are levying those taxes,’ he said.
The bill that would eliminate the wait would alter a 2005 law. Before then, felonies in Nebraska brought a lifetime voting ban in most cases.
At the time Nebraska was in step with other states. Now, while a few states require wait times for specific offenses, Nebraska is alone in requiring a general waiting period beyond imprisonment and release from parole or probation, said Margaret Love, director of the Collateral Consequences Resource Center which keeps a 50-state database on restoration of rights.
Wayne, who represents parts of Omaha with strong minority populations, said reconnecting people to the voting process is integral to successful reentry. He is pictured here in his office at the Nebraska state Capitol in February
Kathy Wilmot, a member of the University of Nebraska Board of Regents, testifies against the bill that would remove the two-year waiting period. Wilmot argued that the wait helped to convey that the right to vote is special
The bill’s author, Democratic state Sen. Justin Wayne, said he was going door to door in his first election in 2016 and was told by would-be constituents that they could not vote. Much of the reason was confusion over the law’s waiting period, he said.
He has introduced bills multiple times to do away with the wait period, coming close to success in 2017 when a bill passed the Legislature but was vetoed by then-Republican Gov. Pete Ricketts.
Wayne, who represents parts of Omaha with strong minority populations, said reconnecting people to the voting process is integral to successful reentry. His bill advanced this past week from a committee to the full Legislature.
‘When people get out of our system, they’ve got to feel engaged in their community, and the number one way for a person to feel engaged in their community is to be able to vote for the leadership of that community,’ he said.
Kathy Wilcot, a member of the University of Nebraska Board of Regents, was the lone dissenter from among the nearly 20 witnesses who spoke on Wayne’s bill. Wilcot stressed she was speaking as an individual and not on behalf of the university.
‘I do think that hopefully the waiting period reinforces the fact that voting is something very special, and hopefully that will be part of the things that an individual would consider if they´re tempted to break the law again,’ she said.
Three of the witnesses with criminal records who spoke in favor of the legislation said in later interviews the waiting period is not a deterrent to future crime, but rather a barrier for those who have served their sentences.
Demetrius Gatson is among the more than 10,000 people in Nebraska who has no right to vote because they haven´t completed their sentences. Because of her probation, she will have to wait until 2030 to vote.
Since her 2018 release, she has obtained graduate degrees and served in a variety of volunteer roles.
Now 48, Gatson has set up her own nonprofit and is executive director of Q.U.E.E.N.S Butterfly House, a safe house for women trying to reenter society.
For the people she works with, being able to register to vote provides a sense of acceptance, especially when there are so many barriers on where they can live, jobs they can work and who they can associate with, she said.
Gatson said there are critical issues she cares about, including education and criminal justice, but said, ‘I don’t have a say in anything that goes on in my country because I’m a felon.’
Steven Scott, 33, was paroled in 2015 after serving more than four years on assault and other charges
Scott is pictured waiting to testify in favor of a bill to provide restoration of voting rights upon completion of a felony sentence or probation for a felony
Steven Scott, 33, was paroled in 2015 after serving more than four years on assault and other charges.
After his release, he was rejected repeatedly for apartments, got a job only because his boss knew him and had his pursuit of an advanced degree derailed after his record came to light.
He is now married with two small children and owns his own business, a physical rehabilitation and athletic coaching center. He also has regained voting rights and cast ballots for Republican candidates in his first elections, including 2020.
He sees the two-year wait period as one link in a long chain of barriers for those trying to reenter society.
‘You can’t harm society by voting,’ he said. ‘You can only help it.’
[ad_2]
Source link
