‘This is my World Cup Final!’ Vardy vs Rooney: A Courtroom Drama viewers reveal they’re ‘hooked’

[ad_1]

Vardy vs Rooney: A Courtroom Drama viewers were delighting at the new two-part series which aired on Wednesday night – saying they were ‘loving’ the show.

Those watching at home said they were ‘hooked’ by the TV offering – which was created from real court transcripts from Coleen and Rebekah’s libel battle this summer – with one even saying: ‘This is my World Cup Final!’

The show features Chanel Creswell as Coleen and Natalia Tena as Rebekah along with Michael Sheen as Coleen’s barrister David Sherbourne. 

‘This is my World Cup Final!’ Vardy vs Rooney: A Courtroom Drama viewers reveal they’re ‘hooked’

Reaction: Vardy vs Rooney: A Courtroom Drama viewers were delighting at the new two-part series which aired on Wednesday night – saying they were ‘loving’ the show

Viewers couldn’t get enough of the show, with one Tweeting: ‘Vardy vs Rooney: A Courtroom Drama…this is equally ridiculous & iconic. I love it.’

Another said: ‘Yay! Emily In Paris returns AND Vardy vs Rooney on C4 – a very, very good tv day!’

Someone else commented: ‘I’ve stumbled on the Vardy vs Rooney courtroom drama on C4 and I’ve been sucked in! It’s like when you start snacking on tasteless Christmas chocolates which you know are awful but just keep eating…’

Loving it: Those watching at home said they were 'hooked' by the TV offering - which was created from real court transcripts from Coleen and Rebekah's libel battle this summer - with one even saying: 'This is my World Cup Final!'

Loving it: Those watching at home said they were ‘hooked’ by the TV offering – which was created from real court transcripts from Coleen and Rebekah’s libel battle this summer – with one even saying: ‘This is my World Cup Final!’

A fourth viewer said: ‘Vardy Vs Rooney: A Courtroom Drama’?????? yeah you can inject that!’

A fifth wrote: ‘Anybody else watching Vardy VS Rooney. It’s actually really good keeps you hooked!’

Another said: ‘Michael Sheen is so good. #VardyVsRooney’, while another wrote: ‘I am way more invested in this than I expected to be!’

Along with Chanel, Natalia and Michael, the programme stars Simon Coury as Rebekah’s barrister Hugh Tomlinson and Marci Nagyszokolyai as Rebekah’s husband Jamie Vardy. 

Thrilled: Viewers couldn't get enough of the show, with one Tweeting: 'Vardy vs Rooney: A Courtroom Drama¿this is equally ridiculous & iconic. I love it'

Thrilled: Viewers couldn’t get enough of the show, with one Tweeting: ‘Vardy vs Rooney: A Courtroom Drama…this is equally ridiculous & iconic. I love it’

Created from the real court transcripts, Vardy v Rooney: A Courtroom Drama, gives viewers a chance to relive the untelevised scenes from inside the courtroom with all the drama that kept the public and media gripped for weeks.

The programme, produced by Chalkboard, who made BBC’s historical murder series Murder, Mystery and My Family, will air this week on Wednesday and Thursday.

Coleen and Rebekah both shared festival family photos as the dramatisation of their trial played out on TV.

Coleen and her husband Wayne enjoyed a family day out at Lapland UK with their sons Klay, nine, Kit, six and Cass, four.

Keeping busy: Coleen and Rebekah both shared festival family photos as the dramatisation of their Wagatha Christie trial plays out on TV

Keeping busy: Coleen and Rebekah both shared festival family photos as the dramatisation of their Wagatha Christie trial plays out on TV 

The media personality shared a sweet picture of their young family posing up for a Christmas photo with Santa and said they had an ‘amazing day’. 

‘Thank you @laplanduk for an amazing day as always,’ Coleen captioned the snap. 

In the image, the boys beam as they pose next to Santa and holding matching dog plush toys. Missing from the outing was their eldest son Kai, 13.

Meanwhile, Rebekah took her children for a day out at Belton House in Lincolnshire hours before the show aired.

Family: Rebekah took her children for a day out at Belton House in Lincolnshire hours before the show aired

Family: Rebekah took her children for a day out at Belton House in Lincolnshire hours before the show aired

The WAG shared a snap of herself with children Taylor, 11, Sofia, seven, Finley, four, and Olivia, two.

Rebekah is also mother to daughter Megan, 17, from a previous relationship.   

The former friends first publicly fell out in 2019 when Coleen accused Rebekah of leaking posts from her private Instagram account to The Sun.

Her rigorous sleuthing to find the culprit earned her the title Wagatha Christie in reference to mystery writer Agatha Christie.

Rebekah denied the claims and sued for libel, but lost in the High Court in July where her evidence was deemed ‘manifestly inconsistent’ and ‘not credible’.

In October, she was ordered to pay 90 per cent of Coleen’s legal bills with the first £800,000 needing to be paid within six weeks.

Exciting: Created from the real court transcripts, Vardy v Rooney: A Courtroom Drama, gives viewers a chance to relive the untelevised scenes from inside the courtroom with all the drama that kept the public and media gripped for weeks

Exciting: Created from the real court transcripts, Vardy v Rooney: A Courtroom Drama, gives viewers a chance to relive the untelevised scenes from inside the courtroom with all the drama that kept the public and media gripped for weeks

The former Dancing on Ice contestant also has to foot her own lawyers’ bills, meaning the enormous cost of her failed libel claim is around £4million.

Rebekah reportedly faces an estimated £1.5million legal bill towards her costs following their ‘Wagatha Christie’ High Court libel battle.

The WAG – whose reputation is in tatters after she scored one of the worst own goals in British legal history – is thought to have to find £800,000 of it in weeks.

New: The upcoming series recreates the legal battle between the WAGS that came to be known as the ' Wagatha Christie ' trial (Coleen and Wayne pictured at court)

New: The upcoming series recreates the legal battle between the WAGS that came to be known as the ‘ Wagatha Christie ‘ trial (Coleen and Wayne pictured at court) 

It comes at the hands of a High Court judge who dismissed her evidence as ‘evasive or implausible’ in one of the most closely-followed cases in recent years.

She was accused of deliberately deleting WhatsApp messages central to the case as it was suggested her agent also intentionally dropped her phone in the North Sea.

Vardy and her footballer husband were left with the bill after Mrs Justice Steyn ruled in favour of Rooney in a judgment that said swathes of her evidence given under oath had been ‘manifestly inconsistent’, ‘not credible’ and needed to be treated with ‘very considerable caution’.

She lost her high-profile libel claim against Rooney in July when Justice Steyn ruled that Rooney’s viral social media post accusing Vardy of leaking her private information to the press was ‘substantially true’.

It followed a viral social media post where Rooney had revealed she had put false stories on her Instagram page. These fake tales then emerged in The Sun newspaper.

Because she had changed her settings so only one user could see it she felt confident to make the famous declaration ‘it’s….Rebekah Vardy’s account’.

Drama: The former friends first publicly fell out in 2019 when Coleen accused Rebekah of leaking posts from her private Instagram account to The Sun

Drama: The former friends first publicly fell out in 2019 when Coleen accused Rebekah of leaking posts from her private Instagram account to The Sun

In an order made public on Tuesday, the judge ruled that Vardy should pay 90% of Rooney’s costs.

Rooney incurred total costs of more than £2 million, but £350,000 of those had already been racked up before the trial in May, so those were removed to produce a final figure of £1,667,860.

Vardy was ordered to pay £800,000 of the costs bill by 4pm on November 15.

Not happy: Rebekah denied the claims and sued for libel, but lost in the High Court in July where her evidence was deemed 'manifestly inconsistent' and 'not credible'

Not happy: Rebekah denied the claims and sued for libel, but lost in the High Court in July where her evidence was deemed ‘manifestly inconsistent’ and ‘not credible’

End result: In October, she was ordered to pay 90 per cent of Coleen's legal bills with the first £800,000 needing to be paid within six weeks

End result: In October, she was ordered to pay 90 per cent of Coleen’s legal bills with the first £800,000 needing to be paid within six weeks 

[ad_2]

Source link