[ad_1]
Last month, she sensationally claimed that she was ‘framed’ during the WAGatha Christie affair, months after losing the high-profile court battle to Coleen Rooney.
And on Wednesday, Rebekah Vardy, 40, took to her Instagram Stories where she re-shared a meme, suggesting that she’s been ‘one of God’s strongest warriors’ this year.
The wife of Leicester and England footballer Jamie, 30 – who has just come back from a string of lavish holidays with their brood – also asked for an easier ride in 2023.
Strong warrior: On Wednesday, Rebekah Vardy, 40, took to Instagram where she re-shared a meme, suggesting that she’s been ‘one of God’s strongest warriors’ this year (Pictured in May)
The meme was of a man on the phone was captioned: ‘Me calling God to make sure I ain’t on his Strongest Warriors list again for 2023.’
Rebekah’s post comes after she and Jamie spent time enjoying far-flung trips with their children.
Rebekah and Jamie share three together Sofia, seven, Finley, four and two-year-old Olivia.
Jamie has a daughter – Ella, 11 – with a former partner and Rebekah has Meghan, 17 and 11-year-old Taylor from previous relationships.
Drama! Last month, Rebekah claimed that she was ‘framed’ during the WAGatha Christie affair , months after losing the high-profile court battle to Coleen Rooney (Pictured in July)
Hoping for an easier 2023: The meme shared by Rebekah was of a man on the phone was captioned: ‘Me calling God to make sure I ain’t on his Strongest Warriors list again for 2023’
Family time: Rebekah’s post comes after she and her footballer husband Jamie spent time enjoying far-flung trips wit their children.
Rebekah took Coleen Rooney to court for libel – and lost – after Coleen claimed in October 2019 that Mrs Vardy’s social media account was leaking stories about her to the Press.
In an interview for a discovery+ documentary, which examines both sides of the bitter court clash, she says: ‘I wonder, how easy would it be to potentially set someone up in a way that makes it look like that is the only person that has seen those [leaked Instagram] posts?’
She added: ‘I just find it absolutely incredible to this day that she said no one else knew about this.’
During the High Court trial, Mrs Justice Steyn said in her judgment in July that it was ‘likely’ that Mrs Vardy’s agent Caroline Watt ‘undertook the direct act’ of passing on information to The Sun.
OMG! It comes after Rebekah Vardy sensationally suggested that she was ‘framed’ during the Wagatha Christie affair
Scandal: Rebekah, (left), gave her side of the story about the Wagatha trial in the docu-series
Drama! Becky took Coleen Rooney to court for libel – and lost – after Coleen (pictured with husband Wayne in May) claimed that Becky’s Instagram was the source of stories being leaked to The Sun
The judge said: ‘The evidence clearly shows in my view that Mrs Vardy knew of and condoned this behaviour, actively engaging in it.’
Rebecca was ordered to pay up to £1.5million towards Coleen’s legal fees after losing the case, but she still continues to insist she was not the culprit.
And in the documentary series, Vardy vs Rooney: The Wagatha Trial, Rebekah also claims that a mole is still leaking Rooney stories to The Sun – which she also says proves her innocence.
‘The irony is that since I was removed as a follower, stories have been coming thick and fast about the Rooneys,’ she said.
During the trial: Rebekah pictured with her barrister Hugh Tomlinson, KC
A friend of Rebekah’s said the WAG’s suspicions were sparked when a story in The Sun earlier this year, which suggested that Wayne Rooney would have a ‘chaperone’ when he was away from Coleen working in the US.
Mother-of-five Rebekah is on pugnacious form in the documentary, giving an interview dressed head-to-toe in black leather.
At one point she snaps: ‘I have zero tolerance for this bull****,’ and adds: ‘I just find the whole thing really ****ing bizarre.’
She was on holiday in Dubai with her husband when Coleen made the accusations on Twitter and Instagram about the leaks.
Rebekah said: ‘At the time I felt physically sick. I think it must have been the biggest panic attack. I was totally shocked. What to do next? That’s the million-dollar question.
Frenemies: Rebekah was outed by fellow footballer’s wife, Coleen, as the serial leaker of private stories with the line ‘It’s……. Rebekah Vardy’s account’ (pictured together at Euro 2016)
‘I couldn’t understand why someone would do that. Why someone would do that knowing someone’s vulnerable, knowing the impact something like that is going to cause. It’s going to cause a s*** storm – a massive one – and that it did.’
Referring to a fake story about a flooded basement in Coleen’s new Cheshire mansion, Rebekah insisted: ‘The first time I read about the flooded basement was in the Daily Mail online. I love how I get blamed for that one, incredible.
‘If I had been selling stories, where are the messages saying ‘give this to The Sun’? ‘Make sure I get paid for this’. Where are they? There aren’t any – because they don’t exist.’
Court imposed a punitive charge over legal costs, with Rebekah told to pay 90 per cent of Coleen costs.
This was in part because crucial evidence had been destroyed after Mrs Watt accidentally dropped her phone in the North Sea.
Shocking: One of the most talked about moments in the case was the courtroom chatter about the size of Peter Andre’s genitalia – which had been compared to a ‘chipolata’ by Rebekah
Coleen’s legal team has not yet produced a final costs total, but the last figure presented to court was £1,667,860. If that stays unchanged, 90 per cent of that would be £1.5million.
Mrs Justice Steyn decided on 90 per cent, acknowledging there were certain issues that justified Coleen paying for some of the case, including her ‘weak’ allegation that Rebekah was one of the people behind The Sun’s ‘Secret Wag’ gossip column which had ‘added considerably’ to the work of Rebekah’s lawyers.
The total amount of Rebekah’s legal costs is not known, but is expected to be of a similar level to those incurred by Coleen.
The final figure may be reduced if Rebekah does not agree to pay the 90 per cent and a court later considers some costs unreasonable.
[ad_2]
Source link
