Mother, 38, fights her own corner in court… and wins discrimination case against supermarket giant

[ad_1]

A mother with no legal training has won £60,000 at a tribunal after taking on her employers at Morrisons single-handedly.

A judge found that Donna Patterson, 38, was discriminated against by the supermarket when she returned to work after maternity leave.

The groceries giant had wanted her to be a confectionary buyer, but when she fell pregnant it disappeared, with HR informing her there had been restructure.

When she returned after giving birth she was told she now had to work in ‘core grocery’, which as a parent carried an ‘overwhelming’ workload and saw her signed off with stress. 

Mother, 38, fights her own corner in court… and wins discrimination case against supermarket giant

A judge found that Donna Patterson, 38, was discriminated against by the supermarket when she returned to work after maternity leave

The tribunal heard Morrisons had planned to demote her when she was pregnant, which sent the judge ‘ballistic’. 

Unable to afford legal fees of £300 an hour, the former food buyer challenged Morrisons’ lawyers herself and cross-examined eight former colleagues.

The married mother of two’s win has now seen her likened to Erin Brockovich, the Julia Roberts character in the Oscar-winning film of the same name.

The movie tells the real-life story of a mother who, despite a lack of legal knowledge, won a case against a firm that was poisoning the water in her town.

Mrs Patterson has received messages of support since her David-versus-Goliath victory, adding: ‘Somebody wrote, ‘Oh she’s like Erin Brockovich.’

Who is the real Erin Brokovich? 

Erin Brokovich was working as a paralegal when she realised people were getting sick in the same area.

Pacific Gas & Electric agreed to a $333 million settlement with Hinkley, near Barstow in southern California, in 1997 after scientists found hexavalent chromium 6 in the local wells, a result of pollution caused by the company.

Before the Julia Roberts starring movie was released Eri was said to have been extremely nervous.

She said at the time: ‘There were a lot of other people that were involved in this case, other firms, and everybody played a role.

‘I wish they all could have just been seen in the movie. I did worry about how they would feel.’

‘I can see how it comes across as that, but it makes me sound like a pioneer. I don’t want it.’ Her legal battle started in August 2020 when she took a year’s maternity leave from her part-time job as a food buyer at the Morrisons HQ in Bradford. 

The mother, from Wetherby, West Yorkshire, already had a son, Rory, now five, and then had another boy Lorcan, two.

But when she returned to her role last year, bosses assigned her to a different, full-time role.

With no extra pay and a newborn baby to look after, she struggled through the ‘horrendous’ new job and raised several unsuccessful grievances.

‘They had decided that the new full-time role I was in was perfectly suitable for me because I was very experienced, and I should be able to do it with my eyes shut,’ she said. 

See also  Helena Bonham Carter reveals how copying her classmate's work led to the start of her career 

Ms Patterson added to the Yorkshire Evening Post: ‘My baby was around two months old and it was during the pandemic so my head probably was not in the right place to have a discussion like that. 

‘At the tribunal that was what the judge was most frustrated about – there being no duty of care.’ 

The demand took its toll and she was signed off sick with stress.

She later resigned on the grounds of constructive dismissal.

Mrs Patterson initiated legal proceedings and spoke to a few solicitors, with one encouraging her to reach a settlement. 

The married mother of two's win has now seen her likened to Erin Brockovich, pictured, the Julia Roberts character in the Oscar-winning film of the same name

The married mother of two’s win has now seen her likened to Erin Brockovich, pictured, the Julia Roberts character in the Oscar-winning film of the same name

With no extra pay and a newborn baby to look after, she struggled through the 'horrendous' new job and raised several unsuccessful grievances. A Morrisons store is pictured above

With no extra pay and a newborn baby to look after, she struggled through the ‘horrendous’ new job and raised several unsuccessful grievances. A Morrisons store is pictured above

But she said: ‘I just fundamentally couldn’t accept that. It wasn’t ever about the money.

‘It was for Morrisons to say we did wrong… and we were sorry and we will do better.

‘I just want to see my children, but I also want to be mentally stimulated by going to work. I don’t understand why employers still find it so hard to accommodate those two things.’

Realising she couldn’t afford a lawyer, she represented herself – and won after a five-day hearing.

Recalling the moment, she said: ‘I just felt these tears streaming down my face.’

Morrisons said: ‘We don’t accept we acted in an unfair way and believe a number of the facts have been misrepresented. We are considering an appeal.’

See also  World Cup's sexiest fan Ivana Knoll slams Qatar's 'circus' FIFA World Cup after trouble in Doha

[ad_2]

Source link